KL CHRONICLE: October 2010

Thursday, October 21, 2010

UMNO Youth Chief Khairy Jamaluddin's full speech - 20/10/10

As a political organization centred on performance and achievement, UMNO Youth needs to be assessed by a number of performance indicators. The Deputy President in his officiating speech last year outlined this approach. Specifically, among the performance indicators to measure our effectiveness are the number of new members and the level of support from young voters towards UMNO and Barisan Nasional.

It is with pleasure that I announce, UMNO Youth, since the beginning of the current term, leads all other party wings and the main body on this front, with an additional 41,663 new members, which accounts for 43 percent of all new party members. Though collectively we have good reason to be proud of this trend, I hope the efforts of all UMNO Youth divisions and branches to court new members will continue to grow. I say this because at present there are certain divisions that appear content merely with nominal additions. Every division must shoulder the responsibility of increasing the number of new members and to further register them as voters. 

As a mass-based party, we require extensive participation from teenagers and youths at grassroots level. I want there to be no more cases of young people wishing to join UMNO but having to wait for years owing to bureaucratic reasons or political sabotage by those who feel threatened by new blood and new talent. I fought hard to ensure that UMNO Youth Leaders at the branch level can now sign off on membership forms to ease the entry of young people into UMNO. We should take advantage of this recent amendment to the constitution by making sure there is a comprehensive, continuous and serious effort to add to the numbers of new members.


We should recognise that come the next General Elections, it is estimated that young voters will account for 80 percent or almost 3 million of new voters, and that the proportion of their votes will increase from 41 percent in the 12th General Election to 49 percent in the 13th General Election. This is in line with our research, which found that 75 percent of young people qualified to vote do plan to exercise that right in the coming election. At the same time, our research also showed that 62 percent of these young voters are fence sitters who will cast their votes based on the party and candidate they feel is best. 


We must accept the fact that young voters today are able to distinguish between mere rhetoric and genuine service, between elaborate pretensions and sincere efforts. Young people no longer appreciate politics reliant on rhetoric, demonstrations, lodging police reports and urging the government to arrest anyone who does not share our political beliefs, although such politics may still be appropriate in certain contexts. In all likelihood, such politics will only serve to drive them further away from us. 

The new era also demands we shape a youth leadership that is more open and progressive, respected by all levels of society, across race and religion. This is also consistent with the moderate brand of politics or siyasah wasatiyyah practiced by the UMNO President himself. Contemporary politics do not permit us to indulge in political guesstimates where strategies are based on biases and personal assumptions, instead of actually referring to the target group for their views and ideas. The rise of the youth vote demands a new approach and direction.

This new approach I speak of has been manifested in an organized, systematic and thorough engagement exercise at a level previously unseen in UMNO Youth. BN Youth Lab was spawned as the brainchild of the President himself – established by Barisan Nasional Youth to better understand the aspirations and concerns of young Malaysians. 
Various policy proposals were borne of the Youth Lab covering various aspects such as housing, education, child and parental care, the minimum wage, PTPTN loans, commercial loans and prices of goods. Alhamdulillah, during the Budget 2011 presentation, the Prime Minister, acting in his capacity as Minister of Finance recognized the voice of young people in the country – brought to the fore by BN Youth – by inserting into the Budget a number of key proposals from the BN Youth Lab:- 

First: Skim Rumah Pertamaku to assist young people who have recently entered the workforce earning less than RM3 thousand a month to own their first home more affordably; 

Second: The creation of the 1Malaysia Youth Fund for the purpose of youth development and the implementation of programs characterizing the spirit of 1Malaysia with an allocation of RM20 million; 

Third: Commitment on the part of Government towards a minimum wage via the creation of the National Wage Consultation Council; 

Fourth: The allocation of funds of RM474 million to increase skills through various training institutes for non-graduates such as school leavers; and


Fifth: The widening of the scope for current tax breaks for expenditure incurred in sending parents to daycare centres as well as the costs that their care incurs. 

Moreover, for the first time in history, a BN youth initiative was mentioned and accorded recognition in the budget speech. This is something we very much appreciate. More importantly, we have helped many young people through the implementation of these policies. On the issue of the minimum wage, more than 6 million young workers will experience an elevation in their status with more appropriate wages. On the other hand, Skim Rumah Pertamaku gives hope and opportunities to many young people who previously may not have been able to afford to buy their own homes. I have also been flooded with hundreds of messages of gratitude over UMNO Youth and BN Youth’s efforts, which have presented them with something special. This is the Youth movement that represents, speaks for, and champions the aspirations of all Malaysians. 

Apart from the above, we also organised the Rally 1Malaysia, which succeeded in bringing together 15,000 young Malaysians of all races. We have also begun a series of Jelajah 1Malaysia programs, which combines the participation of youths with unity-based programs. We are also going to tour the entire country to repair thousand of homes of poor families. 

I am also pleased to announce that the next wave of UMNO Youth activity is geared towards overcoming the problem of unemployment amongst the younger generation. At a time when we are heading towards a status of a high-income country, we want to avoid widespread despair caused by unemployment. For that, we must further affirm the fight against unemployment with various initiatives encompassing the push for a youth unemployment insurance scheme for those who are made redundant, a focus on training to increase skills and the organizing of career expos to ‘matchmake’ employers with job-seekers. 

In being committed and steadfast in understanding and championing aspirations of the youth, we also propose that the University and University Colleges Act 1971 be amended to allow university students to be actively involved in politics. What is the point of us trumpeting that young people are important assets and future leaders if their wish to involve themselves politics is denied and met with scorn? Once again, I am grateful for the President’s open minded-ness in agreeing to consider this proposal. UMNO Youth does not only wish to give adequate space for the best minds to contribute through politics but more than that, we want to acknowledge and elevate this group who are most definitely looking to us for leadership. 

As the President said, the era of “government knows best” is over. In the past we may have asked young people to be thankful for all the development brought about by UMNO and Barisan Nasional. I recall my days as a university student, constantly reminded to feel precisely that sense of gratitude to UMNO and Barisan Nasional. A slew of government policies were laid before us with little room for input and feedback – everything was already determined for us. That is what was meant by “government knows best”. Try doing that today; this formula employing a logic of political gratitude as means of garnering support from young people will most assuredly be rejected. 

It is not that young people today are not grateful to previous generations or that they do not understand history, but they do not wish to be held hostage to it. While the younger generation should be reminded of dark moments in our history such as the May 13 riots, but they will not stand for scare tactics or political blackmailing in the form of telling them that any deviation from the Government’s wishes would lead to another May 13 episode. It is in the nature of the young, that attempts to coerce them into anything do not bode well and are likely to invite rebellion. 

This subject was touched on by the President in his speech during the BN Youth Lab townhall session. He spoke of a new political milieu or political environment. In this new arena, we cannot hope to win merely by use of force. For example, the President mentioned the pressure applied by those who still hold on to old tactics in dealing with statements or actions regarded as sensitive or racially charged. Their response to dealing with most anything of that nature is to arrest those involved using whatever means possible. 

Undoubtedly, there is a time and place for force and authority to be applied especially when national security is at risk from terrorists and extremists. But for us to act with force upon every statement that tests the limits of our patience will certainly not solve the problem. We might be able to arrest one or two, but what of the hundreds of thousands of their supporters? In the end, disaster may befall us for in our obsession with winning the battle we may just end up losing the war. 

What is required today is a politics based on thoughts and ideas. The current political sphere is no longer entirely about the struggle for power, but a competiton of minds, a battle of ideas. Like it or not, those who challenge our political ideology must be defeated through the sharpness of our intellect and the superiority of our arguments, not by relying on executive power. 

Young people today increasingly relish political choices that appeal to their cognitive abilities. The spread of information through social media such as Facebook and Twitter is now a choice over traditional mass media. There are close to 8.5 million Facebook users in Malaysia, of which 84 percent are 35 years old or younger. Their thoughts are not shaped by statements or comments by ministers in Buletin Utama or Warta Perdana but by excerpts from YouTube that cannot be controlled or influenced. The world of young people is incredibly different – today, that world is a cyber-world; a world filled with information and interaction 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. 

As such, engagement with them must take into account a more critical thought process and perspective compared to before. We can no longer shove lopsided propaganda down their throats. We must practice an inclusive culture that appreciates participation of youths and teenagers; and no longer a top down political culture. Young people have a sense of idealism and of their own opinions; the way to winning them over is to include them directly in the process of nation building. 

Embrace them in the manner of the Prophet Muhammad P.B.U.H with regards to his followers. Although he was chosen by Allah SWT as His Messenger, as a leader he never displayed arrogance that precluded him from hearing the views of others. 

Allah SWT reminded us of that in Surah Ali Imran: 159 : 

It is part of the Mercy of Allah that thou dost deal gently with them. Wert thou severe or harsh-hearted, they would have broken away from about thee: so pass over (Their faults), and ask for ((Allah)`s) forgiveness for them and consult them in affairs (of moment). Then, when thou hast taken a decision put thy trust in Allah. For Allah loves those who put their trust (in Him). 

Overall, the younger generation are happy with the UMNO President’s leadership which is inclusive and allows the space for views of youths to be heard. It is clear that the President’s openness represents a ray of hope for young people that they too have rights and a role in shaping the country’s future. 

That same openness however, is not shared by everyone. Many still hesitate and fear to widen the participative sphere for young people. As it is, the space to empower young people in UMNO is still limited. Young people in general very much hope for UMNO to be more open towards its younger members. Educate and guide us, teach us and share your wisdom so we may avoid missteps. See us as representing hope, not as threats. Afford us opportunities and your trust; empower us to shoulder bigger responsibilities because I believe UMNO Youth today is not a Youth movement whose members are motivated by positions, power or projects but we are the bearers of hope, defenders of the land, catalysts of spirit and courage, loyal knights. 

Pasang lilin jalan ke taman 
Hari malam gelap gelita 
Pemuda bukan tamak jawatan 
Kami pejuang nusa dan bangsa 
Buah kurma berlambak-lambak 
Orang memesan sini dan sana 
Keris bertempur disapu minyak 
Pokok ditanam ditabur baja 

In my maiden policy address as UMNO Youth Leader, I touched on the future of Malays and Bumiputeras. Of late, there have been voices asserting that UMNO no longer protects the interests of Malays and Bumiputeras. They allege that a preoccupation with national concerns has caused the Malay agenda to be sidelined. Other groups, who do not have to strike a balance between communal aspirations and national interest seek to capitalise by positioning themselves as heroes of the Malays. 

In the midst of such concerns, I stand before you today to stress in no uncertain terms that the Malay and Bumiputera agenda will never ever be separated from UMNO and most certainly not from the UMNO Youth movement. The fact remains that UMNO was formed to struggle for the rights and voice of the Malays. As such, even with the passage of time and a changing political landscape, our principal struggle and heart of our politics still beat the same rhythm as our forebearers. 

The question of whether UMNO is the one true platform to fight for the future of Malays should not even arise. Then, now and forever UMNO is the haven, the shield and UMNO is the party that will continue the struggle for religion, people and country. 

The question that arises should not be about the aim of our struggle. Without being emotional, we must be bold enough to separate between purpose and method. We must understand the difference between the maqasid or objectives of a struggle and the manhaj or the approach employed to that end. The transformation needed does not concern the maqasid. The goal of elevating the Malays will never be forgotten much less cast aside. What needs to be changed is the manhaj or the way things have been done thus far. 

Some may question, does the manhaj require changing? Is this not the approach that brought about all the successes we enjoy today? Specifically speaking, is it not the New Economic Policy that is the main source of Malay progress and Malaysia’s political stability today? Why should we seek for change, even if just to the manhaj and not the maqasid if the methods have proven successful for the Bumiputeras? Why fix something that is not broken? 

Personally, I view the achievements of the NEP as something to be proud of. Apart from the economic progress, to date national harmony has been preserved due to the effectiveness of the NEP in alleviating poverty for all Malaysians irrespective of race, alongside restructuring society to eliminate the divide based on an identification of race with economic activity. NEP reduced the incidence of hardcore poverty in the country from 50 percent in the 1970s to 4 percent currently, while the figure for Bumiputeras fell from 65 precent to 5 percent. 

The efforts of restructuring society through the NEP has produced a commercial and industrial society as well as a class of Bumiputera professionals. These successes cannot be denied. But for any policy – even that which has been so instrumental to the Malays like the NEP – there will be weaknesses. Moreover, any policy needs reexamination after implementation over a lengthy period of time so as to take into consideration and reflect changes over time. 

On this issue, we need to be honest and not let emotions get the better of us. Let it not be that simply wanting to reexamine an approach or the manhaj of the agenda for Malays invites the charge of being a traitor. Let it not be that wanting to improve the efficacy of the policy or identify weaknesses in the implementation of NEP, leads to Malays being incited that the Barisan Nasional government apparently no longer cares about the Malay agenda. Neither should young Malays today be scared into thinking that Malays will, as it were, disappear off the face of the earth simply because the manhaj or approach to our struggle is modified for better achievements. 

If we are sincere and truly want to achieve the maqasid – the objective, the aim – of our struggle, i.e. a Bumiputera community that attains progress and success through its own strengths and endeavour, then we must be bold enough to acknowledge whatever weaknesses there are in our approach. When the New Economic Model was announced, many expressed concern that the Malay agenda had seemingly disappeared as an obsolete notion that has no place in a borderless world. Malays felt threatened and immediately assumed we were under siege, to the extent that a well-meaning exercise to reexamine the implementation of policies was viewed with suspicion and seen as another attempt to chip away at the rights and special position of the Bumiputeras. 

If all we are is defensive and all we are able to do is proclaim words seemingly to defend this or that, will the Bumiputeras continue to progress? Do Malays become special only by virtue of shouting about the Malay special position? Are we to believe that simply warning certain pressure groups against playing with fire, the Bumiputeras will suddenly succeed? Or in reality have we been led by our emotions to the point where we lost sight of the principal issue? 

What we must do is acknowledge the weaknesses that exist and build a new concept that can elevate the status of Bumiputeras to a level we can be proud of. The NEP has certainly brought many successes but it does have its failings. Bumiputera equity has risen compared to the pre-NEP era, but at a time when economic growth was at its greatest in the 1990s when was ample space for redistribution of that newfound wealth, Bumiputera equity fell from 20.6 percent in 1995 to 19.1 percent in 1999. We further witnessed the increase in the ratio of Bumiputera to ethnic Chinese incomes from RM1.74 to ethnic Chinese for every RM1 to ethnic Malays in 1990 to RM1.81 in 1995. 

During that period, we saw many Malay millionaires given great opportunities and brought to the fore through privatisation programs and ownership of shares via ‘pink forms’. Unfortunately, the shares allocated to Bumiputeras to increase the community’s equity position were sold because some wanted a quick buck, the luxurious bungalow, the Mercedes, the young wife more becoming of their newfound status. With the sudden riches that fell on their lap, they could not remain grounded. The gifts given in trust, that were supposed to be the means of assisting the rest of the community who had yet to benefit in any way, were in the end hoarded to became theirs alone. The immense greed that took over made them forget the greater good. The NEP’s aim to create many more successful Malay corporate tycoons following the success of the chosen ones, was left unfulfilled, due to the voracity that blinded them and preceded their responsibility towards their people. 

These are but some of the leakages and problems that weakened the impementation of the NEP, the old manhaj. By right, with all the power and policies on our side, the Malays should not have to speak about the question of quotas today. For after so long, the Malays should already be able to stand on our own two feet and pass the 30 percent equity target, achieving income levels at par with other ethnic communities as well as successfully exploring high value economic sectors. Unfortunately, we have to admit that none of these have been achieved. 

As UMNO Youth Leader, I meet many young Malays from all levels of society. When I speak of the NEP and the Malay struggle, they retort: “Pardon me, but what have I ever received from the NEP?” Their incomes are below the poverty line, many of them have migrated to cities where the cost of living rises faster than what they earn. These are Malays, Bumiputeras, but they have never enjoyed the fruits of the NEP. Their perception is that the NEP only enriches a few elite Bumiputeras with strong political links. For these youths, the 30 percent equity target does not mean anything because most of them never have and never will be able to purchase shares. This is yet another example of leakages where the NEP, which was rooted on the notion of prosperity for all, ended up being seen as an elitist policy resulting in many Malays sidelined and not looked after. 

This reality demands that we make changes. We must be clear that the New Economic Model does not sideline the Malay agenda. What it does is update the implementation methods to overcome the weaknesses of the NEP. Why should we be afraid of an economic agenda based on merit? Why should we be concerned when those who have the capabilities, who are genuine, are given the opportunity to move forward? Are we so poisonously envious of our own people who work hard and are talented that we are willing to deny them of success? Are we like crabs in a pot, clawing one another down? 

The new manhaj must be guided by merit and needs. Merit stresses on staying power and competitiveness. Merit means the Malay who has the ability, talent and high potential will be discovered, assisted along the way and given ample room to succeed. Merit also demands a level playing field so that the most innovative of farmers, the most diligent of traders, the most knowledgeable of professors and the most competent of contractors are provided with all the encouragement necessary without barriers in the form of political interests or the lack political connections. God-willing, with the inculcation of these new values and culture in the manhaj of empowerment for our people, the Malays will be better equipped to compete on the world stage, without the need for ‘crutches’ anymore. 

The principle of need means that the poorest citizens with no hope of having their welfare met except by the government, are never left behind. For young people who feel they have not received the fruits of the NEP thus far, the New Economic Model must raise their status. The income gap, whether between or within any given race, must be reduced. There is no point in us talking about a high income nation if the rich get richer and the poor remain in despair. The New Economic Model guided by the principle of need will ensure all left behind by the old approach will be represented this time. 

What it all boils down to, is about methods and goals. UMNO Youth is the hope of our people – then, now, forever. But what we hope for our people is real success and genuine advancement. We want to introduce a new narrative for Malays that is not only focusesd on defending rights, position and privileges. We need a bolder narrative to achieve unfulfilled success. 

To be sure, a manhaj or approach takes root not without challenges from within. At times a new manhaj is questioned and takes a long time to be accepted. We should revisit a chapter in Islamic history which explains the vision and intellectual sharpness of Rasulullah P.B.U.H. in creating the manhaj for the spread of Islam in the Treaty of Hudaibiyyah. At that time, Suhail bin Amir, representing the Quraisy, rejected the proposal to refer to the Muhammad P.B.U.H. as Rasulullah or the Prophet of God in the treaty. Even with opposition from his companions especially Saidina Umar Al-Khattab and Saidina Ali bin Abi Talib, the Prophet agreed to the name Muhammad bin Abdullah. He also made the decision to postpone the journey to Mecca and accepted a number of conditions which gave the impression that he was conceding and capitulating to the Quraisy’s wishes to halt the Mukminin or Believers. The Prophet’s companions were ill at ease with his decision. But what is certain now is that his humility, dignity and wisdom was not only recognised by the Quraisy themselves but also opened the path to the dakwah that ultimately proved to be the key to the victory of the Muslims in opening up the city of Mecca. 

Therefore, let us acknoweldge and recognise that the new narrative does not in any way change our purpose. What we need to emphasize is how Bumiputeras can be empowered, through the renewal of a Malay agenda that is more fresh and relevant. Today, we push aside the old manhaj that has not produced comprehensive success and embrace a new approach grounded on merit and need that will build Malay capability and capacity without impinging on the nation’s economic vibrancy. We want to produce more entrepreneurs, technocrats and professionals with self-reliance and who do not depend assistance and goodwill from the government, are independent, stand on their own strengths. We are not a subsidy race but a people with pride and self-worth. We want to internationalise our abilities so we are not limited by reliance on privileges and quotas within our borders, but can flourish and succeed on the global stage. 
This new narrative is not limited to the Malay economic agenda. A new, more progressive approach will also result in a new political orientation. The community’s worries of late touches on the question of political power. There are those who opine that Malays will lose their political power due to the rise of non-Bumiputeras as the deciding force in elections. Those who hold to such beliefs recommend that Malays unite to ensure that power remains in the hands of the Bumiputeras. 

I have no quarrel with a political unity of all Malays. In fact, UMNO Youth once welcomed the muzakarah proposed between UMNO and PAS. But I am also aware of the historical fact that Malays have hardly ever been united. In modern history, save for the opposition to the Malayan Union and the fight for Independence, the Malays are often divided especially by political beliefs and ideology. 

This awareness is all the more relevant now that we see other parties, including PAS, respond cynically everytime the suggestion of this unity is raised. In fact, even on the core issues of religion and race, PAS is willing to rebuff the hand we sincerely extend to them due to their preoccupation with power – to the point that the haram becomes halal, and what is bad becomes good. 

Though this does not mean I reject the possibility of us reuniting, we must accept the reality that today the Malay vote is split. There is no Malay party – be it UMNO or PAS – that can secure a hundred percent of Malay votes. In many areas, the Malay political split is such that 50 percent are on one side and 50 percent on the other. 

This means that any side wanting to win, must win with the support of all Malaysians, regardless of race and religion. If we hope to rely on the Malay vote alone, we should be mindful that there are only 73 Parliamentary seats with a dominant Malay majority of 70 percent and above. Such is the reality. 

We must learn from the results of the last General Elections where we almost relinquished power due to the loss of support from non-Malays. If we still subscribe to the illusion that we can win without their support, then 50 seats currently held by BN are in grave danger. If there is no concerted effort to practise an inclusive and moderate leadership, UMNO’s Malay leadership will disappear come the next election. 

Most assuredly the main responsibility of winning over support from non-Malays lies on the shoulders of certain component parties. Whatever weaknesses they have must be overcome immediately and the responsibilities entrusted upon them must be vigorously carried out. But in the current state of politics – moreoever with the concept of 1Malaysia being our collective compass – Malaysians want to see a BN that can practise the values of camaraderie, justice and fairness. We do not wish to become political chameleons such as those in the opposition, who cannot be held to their word. The promises made to Malays one day are blatantly reneged the next when speaking to non-Malays. 

At the same time, we should not take this inclusive approach on the moderate and wasatiyyah path to only be an instrument of winning elections. If it is simply a political tactic, the aims of creating a united and harmonious country will not be achieved. The politics of moderation or siyasah wasatiyyah must be our creed as the harmony amongst Malaysians is the key to collective peace and prosperity. 

Allah SWT said in Surah Al Hujurat: 13: 

mankind! We created you from a single (pair) of a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that ye may know each other (not that ye may despise each other). Verily the most honoured of you in the sight of Allah is (he who is) the most righteous of you. And Allah has full knowledge and is well acquainted (with all things). 

This is the call and guide for hablun minannas or relations among humans as promoted by Islam. It tells us that differences between people hold blessings and wisdom and it is our responsibility as vicegerents on Allah’s earth to preserve harmony and good relations between one and all. 
Thus, are we in any way less Malay if our struggle cuts across race and religion, without sacrificing basic principles of our cause? Are we heretics for condemning attacks perpetrated by certain parties on people of other faiths? Are we traitors for disagreeing when non-Bumiputeras are labeled as settlers and squatters? The answer is a resolute no! 

In the midst of us calling for Malays to be big-hearted and embrace the politics of moderation, the sensitivities of the Bumiputeras must also be recognized and respected. The recent insult to Islam in a clip on YouTube is a case of how our patience and resolve are tested. Article 153 of the Federal Constitution and the 30 percent equity target must be respected as the pillars and aspirations of Bumiputeras, which neither threaten nor take from the rights and belongings of other races. If there are calls for the existence of vernacular schools be preserved, surely the Bumiputera special position too should be protected and supported by all Malaysians. What of the feelings of Malays who find it so difficult to gain employment in private companies because they cannot speak Mandarin, a criteria advertised as a requirement by so many companies? Or look only at the 50 companies with the largest market capital in Bursa Malaysia; there is not one Malay CEO leading a non-Bumiputera owned company of this group. Are we to believe there is not a single Malay who qualifies on this front when there are many who succeed in managing internationally-renowned companies like Petronas and CIMB? 

At the same time, we must also empathise with the feelings of the non-Malays – when they are referred to as pendatang or told to return to China or India; what of their feelings? This too is their country. This is their country of birth; in fact that of their parents and grandparents. What of the feelings of the poor non-Malay student denied government scholarship despite achieving outstanding results? We often hear of grouses about how the government administration is dominated by Malays. Are we to believe that there are but a few non-Malays qualified to hold senior positions in the civil service? 
When we fail to understand and appreciate the feelings of other races, the barriers that separate us become higher and thicker. Young Malaysians live within the confines of their own ethnic communities. The young Malay who attends religious school, a Middle Eastern university and watches Malay programs on Astro Ria is alien to the young Chinese attending a vernacular school, a Taiwanese university and entertained by Wah Lai Toi. Each perpetuates mutual prejudices because of these barriers that exist. 

The 1Malaysia concept needs to be held as a shared aspiration amongst all races. Community life in a multi-ethnic country certainly demands much patience and courtesy from everyone. We should not hastily pointing fingers at each other in the face of any issue, big or small. We need to understand the feelings of other people if we want them to understand ours. We all need to imagine ourselves in each other’s shoes, assume we swap places, switch fortunes, only then can we appreciate the universal truth that our shared humanity unites us more than it divides. Malaysians need to give and take between one another and this by no means entails one side only taking and the other only giving. Let the fate and future of this country, whether we fail or succeed, be determined together by us all. 

Our perspectives – Malay, Chinese, Indian, Kadazan, Iban or any other ethnic group – are still influenced by communal and religious identities. Though these identities are important and cannot be separated from us, the national interest, the collective interest we share as Malaysian citizens should always be foremost. It is our responsibility to tear down the walls and barriers that divide us. Whatever differences there may be must not become obstacles to a life of mutual respect, understanding, striving together, united in spirit. Irrespective of our differences, as citizens of this blessed land, we pledge allegiance to the same King, we defend the same Constitution, we live under the same laws, we hold to the same values. As such, the aspirations, ambitions, national interest and collective harmony, the Malaysian spirit and passion must be our priority. For each and everyone of us, be it in this hall or out there, in the rural or urban areas, in new villages, estates or kampungs – for all Malaysians, this is where we make our home and family, this is where we forge our destiny, this is our country, this is our homeland. 

This is precisely the Barisan Nasional tradition that has for so long succeeded in uniting us all, many races and religions but each of us Malaysian. We must convince the people of Malaysia that only Barisan Nasional can keep these promises. 

The beat of the opposition’s drum begins with mountains of lofty promises. But more than 30 months since the 12th General Elections, that rhythm of promises is beginning to go flat. It is now clear that the opposition only talks a good talk but cannot deliver on those pledges. 

The people are also getting fed up with the excuses and ploys, pinning everything bad and wrong on BN. What we have been witnessing is that their only uniting asset is the politics of blame or a politics that faults everything that BN does. The problems pertaining to religion, society, economics and unity – all are to do with BN. Are we to suppose that we will experience economic growth through this politics of blame? Will the people be united by the slurs and smears directed at BN? Is this country to be transformed only by slamming BN? Of course not; all that will result from these are chaos and disorder. The politics of blaming BN is actually a cheap tactic to mask their deficiencies. 

In Selangor, the sand theft scandal not only harmed the earth and the people’s trust, but also laid bare severe weaknesses in the state administration. We only need to look at how fervently they denied the existence of such a problem during the initial period after news of the scandal broke. However, only after UMNO had exposed them on many fronts did they finally concede that the sand theft was real. Not only did they admit only after being caught trying to wiggle their way out of a tricky situation, the Pakatan Government in Selangor even had the nerve to ask the Federal Government to solve the problem. 

The opposition does not walk its own talk. Look at the issue of support letters. Lim Kit Siang boldly urged that the practice of issuing support letters be ceased entirely but lo and behold, the support letters culture is evidently more chronic on their side as it is tainted with elements of triads, deception and misuse. In the last General Election manifesto, DAP made umpteen promises that the party would ensure safe, cheap and adequate supply of water. PAS, on the other hand, pledged to deal with the issue of rising living costs and prices of goods. But have they kept their promises and pledges? Clearly not. The reality is, in the midst of Muslims celebrating Aidilfitri, an A.I. Pakatan caliph- Lim Guan Eng presented a ‘festive gift’ by way of increasing water prices. The same gift was also presented to the people of Kedah. 

The fundamental differences between Barisan Nasional and the opposition coalition are stark. For BN, our shared concept is clear, that is 1Malaysia. But one look at the opposition conjures up the image of Cerberus, the three-headed hound found in Roman mythology. Imagine how difficult it must be to have the misfortune of being a body to such a chimera – one head wishes to eat, another to sleep, the other to walk; chaos will surely ensue. Wait until the three heads clash, they will bite each other and tumble down. 

Such monstrous politics is taking form. DAP will never share the same ultimate aspirations as PAS. Although some PAS leaders may say that the formation of the Islamic state is not a priority to please DAP, if we were to ask PAS Youth, they remain unwavering to this struggle. DAP, on the other hand, continues to be rejected by Malays who cannot accept their chauvinistic dreams of bringing down the pillars and fundamentals of this nation’s existence. 

Then there is PKR who continues to be rocked by internal crisis due to their lust for power – chairs are flung, phantom voters even appear on the voters list and democracy is killed as the highest positions go to one family uncontested. 

Any semblance of unity within the opposition coalition is nothing more than an act to ensure that the fragile bonds between them do not break, that the stench of the rot within does not reach anyone. The opposition coalition is in crisis and it is fraying; they lack ability in governing the states they control. Simply put, they are not fit to govern. 

That said, we should guard against following in their footsteps by failing to boost our strengths and relying merely on the weaknesses of our opponents. We cannot stand idly and hope that the people’s support will come rolling in. We must work hard and strive in our jihad to save our country from the destruction of Cerberus, the three-headed chimera, before it devastates our country. Come what may, UMNO Youth warriors will chase Cerberus to the ends of the universe, to defeat these destroyers of the people and this country. 
What is crystal clear is that the maqasid of our struggle hs never been diminished by the passage of time, it remains as it always has been. The same as when UMNO’s flag – the Sang Saka Bangsa – was first waved, the same as when the sacrosanct UMNO song was first sung and the same as when our forefathers first fought to uphold the agenda of the Malay struggle. The maqasid will never cease; it endures as a trust passed on from one generation of champions to another. 
My fellow brothers in arms, recognize that UMNO’s strength comes from each of its members. History has shown that whatever tribulations appear, UMNO members from every corner of the country will rise up to the challenge to fulfil the charge and responsibility we bear together. Today, we are at a crossroads that will determine the future of our cause. This is the moment for us to stand united, based on a manhaj for our times and demonstrate our strength as UMNO members who can look any challenge in the eye and brave all trials and tribulations. 

I ask you now, are you ready to be with me to fulfil the trust we inherited for the sake of future generations? If you are ready, stand with me and we will prove in Galas, in Batu Sapi, in the upcoming elections that this generation of UMNO Youth is resolute in mind and body, spirit and labour – we work hard, we strive, we give. With all that we have, let history remember us as the bearers of our struggle’s maqasid, who succeeded in radiating the torch and spirit of our cause for the sake of our common future. We will never retreat. 
Hidup UMNO! 
Hidup UMNO! 
Hidup UMNO!

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Who Speaks for the MALAYS - Malay's Silenced Majority




1. What many saw as an ongoing conflict between the Malay's and the Non-Malay's intensified dramatically after the March 2008 elections. The disparity and conflicts has grown exponentially as Malay's and Non-Malay's alike continue to be victims of selfish politicians from both sides of the divide. Racial attacks has occurred along the corridors of power to parliament and ends up on the internet with various pro government and opposition bloggers slugging it out to win the hearts and minds of young voters alike. As of this writing, the racial hatred among races has still not subdued and the mistrust among races are at a all time high. 


2. As we cope with savage actions in a country where race politics has dominated for almost 60 years, we are inundated with analysis from political experts and pundits who blame United Malays National Organization (UMNO) for all the mess that we are in. At the same time, racist groups such as the Democratic Action Party (DAP) and the various clan associations continue to attack the Malays and holds UMNO responsible for all the ills in this country. 

3. Amid the rhetoric of hate and growing mistrust, manifest in both anti Malay and UMNO from the opposition, discrimination against Malays or hostility towards Malays has increased. In the aftermath of March 2008, the UMNO President, Dato' Seri Najib Tun Razak (DS Najib) emphasized that Malaysia was going forward and will ensure that all Malaysians feel that they are citizens of this country. Therefore he proposed the concept of 1Malaysia. However, the continued acts of racism by Hindraf, statements by DAP and Namewee have inflamed emotions and distorted views. 

4. The religion of Islam and the mainstream Malay majority have been conflated with the beliefs and actions of an extremist minority of the country population. For example, in shopping malls in the country, job vacancy comes with a caveat that applying candidates should be able to speak in Mandarin or Cantonese, sometimes this job adds aren't even in English or in Bahasa Malaysia. How does the undergraduates from the mainstream Malay majority  are going to apply for a job that is reserved for the wealthy minorities. Therefore, the government comes up with certain policies to ensure that the mainstream Malay majority does not miss out on the economic boom of the country by giving preferential opportunities to the Malays in the civil service and etc.

5. The KL Chronicle will continue to publish article related to the silence majority in this country. Articles will be divided in addressing the roles of UMNO and opposition parties to ensure that  whoever is in power, the policies that benefits the majority of this country should not be removed, and to also ensure that the privileges of the minorities are also taken care of.

Share This

Comments

Facebook Popup

Powered by Blog - Widget