I think Tian Chua, Rafizi Ramli and Tony Pua have lost track of the game plan, and maybe even have lost focus of the endgame as well. And Rafizi’s statement below — plus the statements by Tian Chua and Tony Pua over the last few days — give the impression that they do not really understand what is going on any longer.
What Rafizi said (see below) just confirms that Bahri Mohamad Zin is DAP’s mole in the MACC. “If they turn to discredit morally upright officers like Bahri in order to salvage Najib’s credibility, that is a bad strategy because it will backfire even further,” said Rafizi.
What does Rafizi mean by morally upright? Is Rafizi saying that Bahri was not the senior MACC officer who bonked his staff, a married woman, in the office? If it was not Bahri then who was it? And if Bahri does not reveal who it was then how can he be morally upright by covering up a crime? And if it was Bahri then how the fook can he be morally upright?
Well, over to you Rafizi. If it is not Bahri then say so and tell us who it is because millions of Malaysians are waiting for the name of the senior MACC officer who bonked another man’s wife on his office table.
And is Rafizi also saying that Bahri was not involved in covering up the Teoh Beng Hock and Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed murders? Now, remember, Pakatan Rakyat did say Teoh Beng Hock and Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed were murdered. And Pakatan Rakyat did say that the MACC was covering up these murders.
So, they were murdered and MACC is covering up the murders. That can only mean that there are certain very senior people in MACC who are either involved in the murders or are involved in covering up these murders. And Bahri is very senior in the MACC.
So, either Bahri is involved in the murders or is involved in covering up the murders. And if he were not involved in the murders or in covering up the murders, then, since he is very senior in the MACC, he would know who is.
So what was that again about Bahri being a morally upright MACC officer? How can a fooking morally upright MACC officer cover up two murders? A morally upright MACC officer would expose the criminals and make sure they go to jail. A morally upright MACC officer would not help murderers escape punishment.
And what about the Rosli Dahlan and Ramli Yusuff cases? Is the morally upright Bahri prepared to confess that the MACC, the AG and the IGP fixed up Rosli Dahlan and Ramli Yusuff? And is the morally upright Bahri prepared to reveal that Rosli Dahlan and Ramli Yusuff were fixed up because they wanted to cover up the fact that Malaysia’s national airline company, MAS, lost RM8 billion to cover the RM30 billion Forex loss and also to cover up the fact that the IGP had links with the Chinese underworld and gambling, prostitution, drugs and loan shark syndicate?
Yes, Rafizi, we need the morally upright Bahri to tell the truth and reveal the facts about all these crimes. He cannot be morally upright if he just tries to bring down Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak but covers up all the other more serious crimes.
The alleged crime involving RM2.6 billion is a big deal for you. The RM8 billion MAS and RM30 billion Forex disasters (which combined are worth RM70 billion today) are not a big deal. And that makes Bahri a morally upright person.
Let me get this very clear. Bahri is morally upright because he is trying to bring down the Prime Minister. He does not need to reveal the Teoh Beng Hock and Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed murders or the facts behind the Rosli Dahlan and Ramli Yusuff cases because this does not involve bringing down the Prime Minister.
So, if he keeps silent on the Teoh Beng Hock and Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed murders, or the facts behind the Rosli Dahlan and Ramli Yusuff cases, this does not make Bahri any less morally upright as long as he focuses on bringing down the Prime Minister.
Yes, and this is the Rafizi who engineered the Kajang Move while denying that the Kajang Move was aimed at replacing Khalid Ibrahim as the Selangor Menteri Besar. And this is the Rafizi who said that Khalid must be replaced because he is corrupt and then Saifuddin Nasution had to publicly apologise to Khalid for all the false allegations made against him.
Rafizi had best keep his mouth shut before I stick my dong into it and make him suck it. I am so ashamed I once regarded him as an up-and-coming leader. He is one of the reasons I turned against Pakatan Rakyat. Rafizi has proven to be nothing but just another political pariah. Is this the best MCKK can produce? What a real faggot!
Source : http://www.malaysia-today.net/the-morally-upright-bahri-mohamad-zin-of-the-macc/